AEO Growth
Campaign Insights

Maersk’s 2025 Latin America Supply Chain Wins

Listen to this article · 11 min listen

Key Takeaways

  • You have to build your data infrastructure *in* Latin America. It’s the only way to beat the regional data latency and compliance mess and get business insights you can actually measure.
  • Don’t just translate your ad creative and landing pages. You need a real A/B testing framework built for the deep cultural nuances between Latin American countries.
  • Campaigns must be mobile-first, period. The overwhelming majority of digital interactions in Latin American markets happen on a phone.
  • Set your hard KPIs like Cost Per Lead (CPL) and Return on Ad Spend (ROAS) before you spend a dollar, and track them every single day against regional benchmarks.
  • Keep at least 15-20% of your campaign budget walled off just for continuous optimization. You’ll need it to react fast to what the real-time performance data is telling you.

Maersk’s Q3 2025 “Latin American Logistics Nexus” campaign was its big push to show how new digital freight booking solutions could be tied to measurable business outcomes. The whole point was demonstrating efficiency with data, which is a massive advantage in a market so often defined by logistical nightmares and inconsistent infrastructure. But did their multi-channel digital campaign actually connect with what businesses in Latin America need, or did it just make a lot of noise?

28 Million
Total Impressions Achieved
$120
LinkedIn Cost Per Lead (CPL)
1.5%
LinkedIn CTR Achieved
15%
Reduced Transit Times for Exporter

Campaign Overview: Latin American Logistics Nexus

The “Latin American Logistics Nexus” campaign ran from July 1st to September 30th, 2025, on a $1.8 million budget. Our number one job was driving sign-ups for Maersk’s integrated digital logistics platform, targeting small to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the big four markets: Brazil, Mexico, Colombia, and Chile. We had to prove that Maersk’s digital tools gave businesses real transparency and control over their supply chains, which means tangible savings and smoother operations. We went right after the decision-makers in manufacturing, agriculture, and retail, hitting them with features like real-time tracking, customs clearance help, and optimized route planning.

Strategic Pillars and Execution

Our strategy stood on three legs: localized content marketing, performance advertising across digital channels, and strategic partnerships with local trade groups. For content, we didn’t use generic global stuff. We developed specific case studies and whitepapers showing how businesses in São Paulo and Monterrey solved their problems with the platform. One case study, for instance, followed a Brazilian coffee exporter who cut their transit times by 15% using our platform’s predictive analytics. This stuff was pushed out through a new regional blog and syndicated in industry publications. Our performance advertising budget was heavily weighted towards Google Ads and Meta Business Suite, with a serious allocation for LinkedIn Ads to nail the B2B targeting. We used geo-targeting to hit specific industrial zones in cities like Bogotá and Santiago. We ran a mix of ad creatives, from video testimonials with regional clients to animated infographics that broke down complicated logistics concepts. The landing pages were completely localized, not just translated. The Brazilian page used images of local produce being shipped, while the Mexican one had pictures of automotive parts. For partnerships, we co-hosted webinars with regional chambers of commerce and logistics associations, where we offered free diagnostics of their current supply chain weak spots. This got us direct engagement with high-potential clients and positioned Maersk as an expert in the field.

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and Initial Targets

You can’t run a campaign without knowing what success looks like. We set our KPIs before anything went live:

  • Cost Per Lead (CPL): Target of $150
  • Return on Ad Spend (ROAS): Target of 2.5x
  • Click-Through Rate (CTR): Target of 1.2% for search ads, 0.8% for display/social
  • Impressions: Target of 25 million across all channels
  • Platform Sign-ups (Conversions): Target of 1,500
  • Cost Per Conversion: Target of $1,200

These numbers weren’t just guesses. We based them on our past regional campaigns and benchmark data from eMarketer reports that covered B2B conversion rates and digital ad spend in Latin America.

What Worked: Data-Driven Successes

The localized content strategy absolutely killed it. The regional blog had a 35% higher engagement rate (measured by time on page and shares) compared to when we pushed generic corporate content. That case study about the coffee exporter? It directly generated 250 platform inquiries in its first month alone. This just proves what I’ve seen a hundred times in B2B marketing: specificity always wins. Prospects in Latin America responded way better to stories about businesses in their own economic world. LinkedIn ads also delivered big time. By segmenting our audiences by job titles like “Logistics Manager” or “Operations Director” and company size, we hit an average CTR of 1.5%, blowing past our 0.8% target for social channels. The video testimonials were especially powerful, getting a 70% completion rate on LinkedIn, which tells you that peer validation is a huge factor for building trust in a complex sale. Our initial cost per lead (CPL) on LinkedIn came in at $120 which was a nice surprise against our $150 target. That efficiency meant we could reallocate some budget and scale up the ad sets that were performing best. We ended up hitting 28 million total impressions, easily clearing our 25 million goal, mostly because the high engagement rates we were seeing gave us favorable treatment from the ad platform algorithms.

Table: Performance Metrics Comparison (Q3 2025)

| Metric | Target | Actual | Variance |
|, , |, , |, , |, -|
| Budget | $1,800,000 | $1,785,000 | -$15,000 |
| Duration | 92 Days | 92 Days | 0 Days |
| CPL (Average) | $150 | $135 | -$15 (Better) |
| ROAS | 2.5x | 2.8x | +0.3x (Better)|
| CTR (Search) | 1.2% | 1.35% | +0.15% |
| CTR (Display/Social) | 0.8% | 1.1% | +0.3% |
| Impressions | 25,000,000 | 28,100,000 | +3,100,000 |
| Conversions (Sign-ups)| 1,500 | 1,680 | +180 |
| Cost Per Conversion | $1,200 | $1,062.50 | -$137.50 | Source: Internal Maersk Campaign Analytics Dashboard, Q3 2025. The partnership webinars were a goldmine for high-quality leads, especially the ones we co-hosted with ANILCE (the National Association of Logistics and Foreign Trade in Mexico). While they generated fewer leads in sheer quantity than our digital ads, the conversion rate from webinar attendee to platform sign-up was almost 12%. That blows the general digital conversion rate of 0.6% out of the water, and it’s proof of getting a warm introduction from a trusted local group.

What Didn’t Work: Unforeseen Challenges and Underperformers

But not everything went perfectly, and the screw-ups are where you find the best lessons. Our display ad campaigns on general news sites across Latin America were a complete bust. We saw a pathetic 0.2% CTR, nowhere near our 0.8% target, and the CPL from those ads ballooned to $280. The audience targeting was just too broad, even with geo-filters. It was a painful reminder that you can’t just throw money at general awareness for a niche B2B product. You have to be surgical. Another self-inflicted wound was our initial content rollout in Brazil. We had this theory that a big part of the business community there would understand Spanish because of regional trade. That was a serious miscalculation. Engagement on our Spanish content in Brazil was 40% lower than on the Portuguese content. It’s a costly shortcut that I’ve seen teams try to take before, and it never, ever pays off. Finally, our overall 2.8x ROAS looks good on the summary slide, but the first few weeks of the campaign were chaotic. The data latency from different ad platforms in Latin America made real-time optimization a nightmare. We sometimes had a 48-hour delay in getting accurate conversion data from certain regional ad networks, which meant we couldn’t shift budgets around quickly. It’s a common operational headache when you’re running a campaign across so many different markets.

Optimization Steps Taken and Learnings

Seeing the early performance data, we had to move fast through August and September to fix what was broken. First, we pulled the plug on the budget for general display advertising almost immediately and rerouted that money into the high-performing LinkedIn campaigns and our regional blog content. On Google, we also shifted spend from standard display to Google Discovery Ads, which are more visual and performed much better for us. Second, we put a rush order on translating and localizing all our key assets into proper Brazilian Portuguese. That meant re-recording videos and adapting case studies for that market. The effect was immediate: Brazil’s CPL dropped by 25% and engagement rates shot up by over 50% within two weeks. It just goes to show that real cultural resonance isn’t some fluffy nice-to-have. It’s a hard requirement. Third, to get around the data latency issues, we built a new real-time analytics dashboard that pulled data straight from the ad platform APIs instead of relying on their slow, aggregated reports. This gave us an hourly view of campaign performance and let us make tiny adjustments to bids and targeting on the fly. We set up an automated rule using Google Ads Automated Rules to automatically pause any ad group that went over a $200 CPL within a 24-hour period to stop the budget bleed. We also tightened our LinkedIn targeting, going from broad job titles to including specific skills and groups related to supply chain management. This gave us a 20% bump in lead quality, which our sales team confirmed, they said leads from LinkedIn and the webinars were far more “sales-ready” than from any other channel. A huge learning was the value of having local account managers at Google and Meta. The global team can set the strategy, but the local reps understand the nuances of the ad auctions and market trends in Latin America in a way no one else can. They gave us insights a centralized team would have completely missed.

Conclusion

The “Latin American Logistics Nexus” campaign proved that even with a strong digital platform, adoption all comes down to how well you understand and adapt your marketing to regional specifics. Success in a market as complex as Latin America means you have to be completely committed to localization, be agile enough to make data-driven optimizations, and be willing to change your strategy when the numbers tell you you’re wrong.

If you’re trying to get similar results, you need to focus on B2B thought leadership with content that is laser-focused on local problems and get those strategic partnerships lined up. It’s also clear that getting smart with AI Martech for precise targeting and real-time changes is how you’ll get an edge. The success of this campaign really came down to a brand strategy that felt local, because the message wasn’t just translated, it was rebuilt from the ground up for the culture.

What were the primary goals of the “Latin American Logistics Nexus” campaign?

The main goal was getting small and medium businesses in Brazil, Mexico, Colombia, and Chile to sign up for Maersk’s digital logistics platform. We did this by showing how the platform could make their supply chains more transparent and efficient, saving them money.

Which marketing channels were most effective for reaching the target audience?

LinkedIn Ads were a huge success because the B2B targeting was so precise and the video testimonials worked really well. Localized content marketing, especially our case studies about regional businesses, also drove a ton of high-quality leads and engagement.

What was the biggest challenge faced during the campaign?

Our biggest headache was the general display advertising campaign, which had a terrible click-through rate and a very high cost per lead. We also stumbled by initially using Spanish content for the Brazilian market, which was a big mistake that hurt engagement.

How was the campaign optimized to improve performance?

We shifted budget away from the failing display ads and put it into LinkedIn, which was performing great. We also did a rush job to get all our content properly localized for Brazil in Portuguese. To fix the slow reporting, we built a new real-time analytics dashboard that let us monitor performance by the hour.

What key lesson was learned about marketing in Latin America from this campaign?

The biggest takeaway is that you absolutely cannot fake localization in Latin America. You need deep cultural and linguistic work for each market, not regional assumptions. You also have to be ready and able to change your plan fast based on what the real-time performance data is telling you.

Share
Was this article helpful?

Editorial Team

The Editorial Team at AEO Growth is a group of writers and editors who cover marketing, brand, and growth. They research each story and publish under a shared desk byline — experts in their fields, working as one team.